AFC Warns Against Broadening State Lending Registries

The American Fintech Council (AFC), a respected trade group that advocates for ethical fintech firms, progressive banks, and most top earned wage access (EWA) providers, has recently launched a report. This report warns state officials and regulators against steps to expand compulsory state lending registries to take in non-credit-based products. The AFC, a powerful voice…

Posted

in

AFC Warns Against Broadening State Lending Registries

The American Fintech Council (AFC), a respected trade group that advocates for ethical fintech firms, progressive banks, and most top earned wage access (EWA) providers, has recently launched a report. This report warns state officials and regulators against steps to expand compulsory state lending registries to take in non-credit-based products.

The AFC, a powerful voice in the fintech industry, represents a wide array of organisations. Its mission is to promote fair practices and responsible innovation within the fintech space. This includes standing up for the interests of ethical fintech firms, innovative banks, and the lion’s share of EWA providers. By doing so, it helps to shape a more inclusive and sustainable financial services ecosystem.

The council’s latest move comes in the form of a report. It cautions against the potential pitfalls of broadening mandatory state lending registries to encompass non-credit-based products. The AFC argues that such a move could have detrimental impacts on the industry and the customers it serves. Furthermore, it suggests that these mandates are often driven more by profit than by the needs of consumers or the desire for fair regulation.

Implications of Broadening Mandatory State Lending Registries

Expanding these registries to include non-credit-based products could have far-reaching consequences. The AFC’s report warns that this could lead to a range of potential issues. For instance, it could result in an increase in the cost of providing services. This, in turn, could make these services less accessible for those who need them the most. Also, it could stifle innovation within the fintech sector, a key driver of financial inclusion and economic growth.

The AFC’s warning should serve as a wake-up call for state officials and regulators. It underlines the need for careful consideration and thoughtful discourse before implementing any such changes. The AFC’s emphasis on the potential harms of profit-driven mandates also underscores the importance of putting the needs of consumers and the health of the industry before financial gain.

As we move forward in the digital age, the role of organisations like the AFC becomes increasingly critical. They serve as guardians of ethical practice and innovation in the fintech industry. Their work ensures that progress is balanced with fairness and sustainability, making sure that the benefits of fintech are accessible to all.



Latest News


Latest Articles




Fintech Reviews


Risk disclosure: Investing in financial instruments, digital assets, and fintech-related products carries significant risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. These markets are volatile and influenced by regulatory, technological, and political developments. Such investments may not be suitable for all investors. You should carefully consider your financial objectives, experience, and risk appetite before investing. Seek independent advice where appropriate. Fintech Review does not provide investment advice or endorsements. All content, including news, press releases, sponsored material, advertisements or any such content on this website, is for informational purposes only and should not be treated as a recommendation or promotion of any financial product or service. Fintech Review is not affiliated with, and does not verify or endorse, any project, cryptocurrency, token, or any type of service or product featured in promotional or third-party content. Readers must conduct their own due diligence before acting on any information.